|
<%-- Page Title--%>
<%-- Navigation Bar--%>
<%-- Navigation Bar--%>
|
|
Your Advocate
This
week your advocate is M. Moazzam Husain of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
His professional interests include civil law, criminal law and constitutional
law.
Q: I would like
to have some advice from you on my personal issue. I appeared in the 22nd
BCS exam. and passed the written exam well. I also did very well in my
viva. I opted for the judicial cadre as I am a student of law and I had
a long cherished dream to join the judicial service. I was expecting to
be selected finally. But, unfortunately, just before the result was published,
the Supreme Court stayed publication of result for appointing Assistant
judges. So, we who were expecting to be appointed, are mentally very upset
and devastated, who is not very unusual. I think will realise our mental
condition. My question is are we any way guilty for this? If not, then
who are liable? How long we have to wait ? Is there any legal option open
for us to get any remedy ? What legal action we the sufferers can take
against the persons liable for it ?
A. Karim,
Malibagh, Dhaka. Your
Advocate: You are a student of law and one of those brilliant
students who came out successful in the 22nd BCS (Judicial) Examination
but still going unemployed that too without any foreseeable prospect of
being so. As a sufferer you know the causes of your sufferings better
than anybody else and as such the replies are quite known to you. I suppose,
the queries are made not as much for answers as for sharing the pangs
of a suffering mind.
Nonetheless those are queries and I must meet them in my own way. As you
are aware, in the famous Masdar Hossain's case our Supreme Court declared
the creation of BCS (Judicial) cadre along with other BCS executive and
administrative cadres by Bangladesh Civil Service (Reorganisation) Order,
1980, as amended in 1986, ultra vires the Constitution. Supreme Court
found, amongst others, the judicial service functionally and structurally
distinct and separate from civil executive and administrative services
of the Republic and directed the Govt. to establish a Judicial Services
Commission for recruitment to the judicial posts and to create a separate
judicial pay commission. It has reaffirmed the constitutional mandate
for separation of subordinate judiciary from the executive.
All the conscious citizens of the country and the legal
community in particular are looking forward to seeing implementation of
the directives set out in the judgement. You are aware, lawyers are still
on the street, amongst others, with their demand for implementation of
the separation of judiciary. Judgement in Masdar Hossain's case is passed
in the 2nd day of December, 1999. Government is found taking time one
after another from the Supreme Court for giving effect to the directives
made in the said case. To our utter dismay, the Law Minister recently
said, separation of judiciary would take further 6/7 years to be implemented
which reflects the view of the Government.
You
can easily feel the concern of the Supreme Court and the legal community
in particular in matters of implementation of the directives made in the
judgement. It is believed by many quarters that separation of judiciary
is now a matter days or months. But for reasons still not clear to us
the matter of such public importance is being delayed years after years.
The sooner the impasse is resolved the earlier the answers of your queries
would be available.
|