INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL
COURT
A brief report on the third assembly of states parties meeting
Ahmed
Ziauddin
The
3rd meeting of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) of the International
Criminal Court (ICC) and Rome Statute (RS) was enormously significant
not only for what happened during the meeting but for the fact that
this was the first such meeting held away from the United Nations complex
in New York, and the first in the ICC's Host Country and at the seat
of the Court, The Netherlands.
The
Article 112 of RS established an ASP with each State Party of the Statute
and authorised those other States which have signed the Statute or the
Final Act in Rome to attend as Observers. The Statute assigned the ASP
management oversight of the ICC, consider and decide its budget, decide
questions relating to non-co-operation and perform other functions consistent
to the RS.
As
signatory of the RS, Bangladesh was invited to submit credentials for
its representatives at the third session. The Assembly also invited
twenty-six other Non-State Parties to attend. Observers and Non-State
Parties, though are allowed to participate in discussions, cannot vote.
In fact, so far, ASP adopted, except elections, all decisions by consensus.
All
key ICC officials, the President, the Prosecutor and the Registrar spoke
before the Assembly. In addition, Dutch Foreign Minister spoke on behalf
of the Host country. The President of the ICC, Judge Philippe Kirsch
(Canada), in his presentation outlined progress made by the Court "from
an inspiration to a functioning institution" and how it has commenced
its judicial functions.
The
Prosecutor, Dr. Luis Moreno-Ocampo (Argentine), said that he has opened
two investigations, under Article 53 of the RS, and are analysing six
situations, under Article 15 of the RS, located in four different continents.
He, however, did not reveal details of the situations under analysis
or even the locations. He has been investigating since December 2003
situation in Uganda and from March 2004, situation in Democratic Republic
of Congo.
He
said, in 2005, he expects to analyse eight situations, finish investigation
in one case and the one trial to begin, subject to arrest of the accused,
in early part of 2005. He plans also to investigate two other cases,
one to finish by 2005 and to open two new situations in the middle of
2005. Accordingly, his hands appear already full.
Mr.
Bruno Cathala (France), the Register of the ICC talked in detail, amongst
others, practical steps taken and challenges ahead for the Court now
being built. He introduced draft budget, later approved, amounting to
69.5 million euro out of which 66.5 was allocated to the Court itself
while 3 million for funding the Secretariat of the ASP. After some cuts,
the Assembly approved 2005 budget for 66 million euro.
Election
of the Deputy Prosecutor for the ICC: The Prosecutor under Article 42
of RS forwarded three candidates to the ASP to elect one for the position
of Deputy Prosecutor (Prosecution). The Prosecutor received 198 applications,
mostly from State Parties (77%). Only 21 applications came from Asia,
out of which, three were interviewed. The Assembly overwhelmingly voted
in favour of Ms. Fatou Bensouda, former Attorney General and Minister
of Law of Gambia. All three candidates appeared before a projection
meeting organised by Women's Initiatives for Gender Justice and argued
for their election. The Assembly swayed for gender and geographical
reasons.
Trust
Fund for Victims: The Board of Directors for the Trust Fund for victims
that included Queen of Jordan and Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa
submitted its report for the ASP's approval. It contained the Fund's
Regulation, authority to set-up a Secretariat and its initial budget
for 1.4 million euro.
Relationship
Agreement between the ICC and the UN: The draft Relationship Agreement
between the ICC and the UN was submitted. This Agreement is considered
critical for the work of ICC, amongst others, in areas of exchanges
of information, judicial assistance and co-operation on infrastructural
and technical matters. The Agreement recognised responsibilities of
UN under its Charter and the Court as an "independent permanent
judicial institution". It agreed to respect each other's status
and mandate. In addition to administrative co-operation, it dealt with
access to UN Headquarters, UN Laissez-passer that ICC officials could
use as valid travel document, testimony of UN officials before the Court
and UN co-operation to Prosecutor's investigation.
Conditions
of Service of Judges: The Presidency of ICC, under Article 49 of RS,
submitted specific proposals on conditions of services and compensation,
travel and subsistence regulations, pension scheme for the Judges and
other elected officials of ICC. It covered various gaps in conditions
of service of the Judges adopted in 2002 and included issues like residency,
disability pension and child benefit.
Code
of Professional Conduct for Counsel: The Presidency also submitted a
proposal for a Code of Professional Conduct for Counsel before the ICC.
The document was prepared by the Registry of the Court in consultation
with the Prosecutor. It covered whole range of issues oath, independence,
secrecy and confidentiality, client counsel privileges, fees to disciplinary
regime.
Election
of Members of the Committee on Budget and Finance: The Committee on
Budget and Finance that was established by the Assembly in 2002 also
decided in its 2003 meeting to elect, in place of retiring ones, six
members of the Committee on Budget and Finance.
Liaison
Office in New York: The Registry submitted a report on establishment
of a New York Liaison Office to work with the UN, State Parties and
Non-State Parties, international and regional organisations, non-governmental
organisations, and media organisations. The need for such presence in
New York came out of recognition of this city's importance in international
relations and diplomatic negotiations and for high level presence of
representatives of most of the states of the world. Also it was felt
that RS institutions must play and integrate its own distinctive role
in international peace and justice by its presence in New York.
Special
Working Group on the Crime of Aggression: The RS, under Article 5 (2)
contained that the Court shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime
of aggression after a provision defining the crime and its conditions
are set out according to Articles 121 and 123. During Preparatory Commission
meetings, and since, considerable discussions took place between the
States. A Special Working Group was set-up, a unique mechanism, where
all States who signed the Final act of the Rome Conference and non-signatories
and others joined in.
The
Assembly had before it a report of an informal inter-sessional held
in Princeton, New Jersey in USA, from 21-23 June 2004. The inter-sessional
discussed various aspects of the crime including issues like jurisdiction,
complimentarity, admissibility, general principles of law, conditions
under which the Court could exercise jurisdiction, compatibility with
the UN Charter, investigation and prosecution and other matters.
Because
of limited time available at this third ASP, the Assembly decided to
devote a full day in next ASP to discuss the crime of aggression and
the Chair of the Working Group Ambassador Christian Wenaweser of Liechtenstein
proposed that further inter-sessional meetings could be held in future
to continue consideration.
Bangladesh
and the Assembly of States Parties: As an Observer of the Assembly,
with right to be present and participate, and despite invitation to
do so, Bangladesh chose not to be present, not only in the Assembly
but also in the Special Working Group on the crime of Aggression. Bangladesh
has not even sent its credentials to the Assembly as appears from the
List of Delegations to the Third Session of the Assembly of States Parties
to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC-ASP/3/INF.1)
Bangladesh
also was absent, again, despite invitation, to the Inter-Sessional meeting
of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression held in Princeton,
New Jersey, USA as appears from the list of participants annexed with
the meeting's report submitted to the Assembly (ICC-ASP/3/SWGCA/L.1).
While many other Asian and Arab States including India, Nepal others
follow closely and contribute in discussions on the crime of aggression,
Bangladesh is consistently absent in the development of this critical
international norm.
Asian
Delegates Meeting: In the traditional Asian Delegates meeting with the
NGOs, delegates of Nepal, Japan, Mongolia, Laos, and East Timor attended.
New
President of the ASP: The Assembly elected Mr. Bruno Stagno Ugarte,
Permanent Representative of Costa Rica to the United Nations as the
President of the Assembly's forth to sixth session beginning 2005 when
current President H.R.H. Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein (Jordan)
ends his term.
The
author is Convenor, Asian Network for the International Criminal Court.