Justice
corrupted, justice denied
On the first day of October, a serious graft allegation against an additional
judge of High Court Division was made by the president of the Supreme
Court Bar Association. It was alleged that the accused judge took bribe
from a client for fixing a bail and that he continues sitting at his chamber
and communicating with the clients. Moreover, there was allegation against
him of misappropriation of the Bar Association fund when he was one of
its office-bearers. Then for what quality has he been appointed as an
additional judge? It was alleged that when the lawyers launched agitation
against the superceding of senior judges and non-confirmation of the additional
judges despite the recommendation of the chief justice in March this year,
the man in question called a convention to oppose them as a pro-government
layer. And in the next month he was awarded with the post of additional
judge.
Allegation
of corruption against lower court judges are very frequent in our country
and the confidence of the common people of getting fair justice in the
lower court is become fade day by day. But corruption charge against an
additional judge of the High Court Division has shocked the nation and
thrown a blotch on the sacred image of the higher judiciary. Wholesale
politicisation of the judiciary and recruitment of judges on the basis
of political consideration are the main reasons behind this kind of corrupt
practices and free fall of judge's morality. Inefficient, unskilled and
corrupted lawyers, who are very much active on the ongoing pro- and anti-government
lawyer's mud-slinging are being appointed as judges in the High Court
Division, undermine the sacred image of the judiciary and suffocating
the chance of getting fair justice.
But
these kind of illegal and immoral practices must be stopped anyway for
ensuring justice. At first the recruitment process must be made transparent
and the men of efficiency, skill, ingenuity and integrity should be appointed
as judges. The judiciary must be made independent without delay. The ongoing
naked and disgraceful practice of political toeing by the lawyers should
be banned. And of course in the present case, the graft allegation must
be investigated by the Supreme Judicial Council.
Md. Rezaul Karim, LL.B (Hons), 3rd year, University
of Dhaka.
*****
In
every society judiciary and judges plays a vital role in upholding certain
values: they represent the establishment and uphold the 'status quo'.
Judges are expected to be honest. In discharging his judicial function
a judge is subject to nothing but to the law and the command of his conscience.
But, on 1st October, Supreme Court Bar Association's president Barrister
Rokanuddin Mahmud, brought allegation of corruption against a High Court
Division judge. This allegation against the highest judiciary shocked
the nation. It's a dent on the image of the higher judiciary. Such allegation
also diminishes the public confidence over the impartiality of the judiciary.
Against
the backdrop the Chief Justice have to take proper steps to find out the
truth. Our Constitution has provisions for Supreme Judicial Council in
clause (3) of Article-96. According to sub-clause (b) of clause (4) the
council can inquire into the capacity and conduct of a judge. Sub-clause
(b) of clause (5) provides "where upon any information received from
the council or from any other source, the president has reason to apprehend
that a judge -- may have been guilty of gross misconduct, the president
may direct the council to inquire into the matter and report its finding.
The president can remove a judge if he is found guilty of misconduct.
We demand the immediate inquiry of the allegation.
Khan
Mohammad Ilias Sadik,
LL.B (Honours), 3rd year, University of Dhaka.
*****
Are
police beyond control?
The police are the guarantor of public security throughout the Bangladesh.
But most of the times, they are highlighting for their illegal goings-on
and criticised in several times. All national dailies including The Daily
Star published a phonograph of an Awami League woman activist in 28th
September 2003. In the snapshot, it is evidently seen that the woman police
are dragging the blouse of the female activist. This is awfully disgraceful
hearsay for us. The similar outlook was also seen during the prior Awami
League regime and the rubber stamp is occurred under the ruling coalition
government decree. One government goes out, another government comes but
the law enforcing agencies doesn't change. Police are not guilty for all,
I think the politician are the solely guilty for this shameful act. If
our political culture is not change, then this panorama will be occurred
one after another. However, the police should know that they are not the
servants of the politician; their foremost duty is to protect the dignity
of people.
Md.
Zillur Rahaman, MSS Economics, Bangabandhu
Hall, DU.
*****
Change
attitude, not dress
According to a report of Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB),
Bangladesh is most corrupted country across the globe for the third time.
As expected, the government rejected the report and the opposition welcomed
it. The report identified Bangladesh Police as one the most corrupted
sector. We are not surprised at all to see police in the top of the list.
Almost all citizen of the country believes that police is corrupt. Recently
I read two new item in the newspaper regarding police i.e. some 300 police
personnel has been fired from service for their alleged involvement in
criminal activity and about 30,000 member of the police forcer has been
found physically unfit. The other news is on changing the colour dress
for the police force. I welcome the first decision of the govt. to dismiss
the corrupted officers. But I cannot understand why the action was taken
against officer of Inspector level and below. Does it mean that only the
lower level officers are corrupted and higher officers and angles? I have
read allegation of corruption against officer as high as DIG. So, I urge
the government should take drastic action against any officer if he is
found guilty of any illegal activity irrespective of his rank and position.
The second news was on change of colour of police uniform. I cannot really
understand the need to change colour of police uniform. Will it help in
any way to improve the performance and effectiveness of police? We all
know that police cannot discharge their duty properly for resource constraint.
Then why the govt. will expend money for changing dress colour? Cannot
they allocate it for improving performance of police by increasing vehicles
and other logistics? I think we first need to change the behavior and
attitude of the police, not their dress, to make it more effective and
people friendly.
Dilshad
farhana, Advocate, Dhaka Judge Court.
*****
According
the newspaper reports, govt. has decided to change the dress of police.
If it be true, then I wonder what is the thing that leads the govt. to
take such decision. This year also Bangladesh has been the most corrupted
country in the world as per the report of Transparency International.
And as usual police department has won the top position in the list. In
this circumstances what does the govt. desire to achieve by changing their
dress? What the members of the police department are doing is diametrically
opposite to their duties and functions, to the aspiration of the citizen.
Police are called the friends of people, but here public fears the police
most. Public have lost their total trust and confidence over police. In
the one hand, police have lost their image and on the other hand they
are not well equipped to fight terrorists with modern weapons. So what
is necessary is to improve their morality and to render modern logistic
support. Changing dress will serve no purpose. It is like bottling old
wine in new bottle.
Dr.
Md. Alauddin,
Tolarbagh, Mirpur, Dhaka.