|
<%-- Page Title--%>
<%-- Navigation Bar--%>
<%-- Navigation Bar--%>
|
|
Your Advocate
This
week your advocate is M. Moazzam Husain of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
His professional interests include civil law, criminal law and constitutional
law.
Q:
I am a former government employee. During my serving time I worked in
some important office of the government and as such I had the opportunity
to witness some misdeeds of some high Govt. offials and ministers. Now
I am planing to write a book on my experience where I want to make some
of the misdeeds and also make some official documents public. Will it
be a criminal offense if I do so? Please advice.
H.H,
Dhanmondi, Dhaka. Your
Advocate: I appreciate your inner urge to disclose the misdeeds
committed by some high officials of the Govt. and Ministers in the book
( seemingly an autobiography) that you are planning to write. You are
a former Govt. employee and willing to make public the misdeeds done by
and the documents bearing testimony of the misdeeds of those high ups
experienced by you during your service-life. The question is whether such
publication, if any, will amount to criminal offence. The query is plain
and simple but the answer involves a mixed question of laws and facts
calling for a bit of reflection on both. Any person making or publishing
any imputation concerning any person intending to harm or knowing that
such imputation will harm the reputation of such person shall be punishable
for defamation. Law, at the same time, says, it is not defamation to impute
anything which is true and for the public good the imputation should be
made or published. Law goes further to say that it is not defamation to
express in good faith any opinion respecting conduct of a public servant
in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character
so far as that relates to such conduct. The main thrust of law is that
the writer's efforts need be fair and honest taken for public good and
not prompted by malice or personal vendetta and the writer must keep himself
within the bounds of things which is substantially true or he reasonably
believes to be true as a man of prudence. It is clear that law permits
you to put on paper things much beyond you are contemplating to do. Your
case is clear as emanates directly from personal experiences and documents.
Still, without meaning discouragement I feel like telling you that materialisation
of your pious wish will depend more on your commitment and moral courage
than on law. You have to be prepared at the same time to face court should
litigation arise as this kind of things do not usually go unchallenged
and the questions of 'truth or falsehood' 'good faith' and 'public good'
remains to be questions of facts to be looked into by court. In the peculiar
circumstances possession of the official documents does not attract The
Official Secrets Act, 1923, but for its use in a book of the kind it would
be advisable for you to take permission from the appropriate authority.
|