Backlog of cases

Star Archive Star Archive

A huge backlog of around 2.3 million cases is pending with the courts across the country including the Appellate Division and High Court Division of the Supreme Court (SC), causing immeasurable suffering to the litigants.
Although the number of judges and the rate of disposal of cases are increasing, the backlog is growing higher, since the number of filing of cases is increasing day by day due to growth of population, SC and the law ministry sources said.
Appointment of competent, experienced and honest judges at the courts, and establishing an independent secretariat for the Supreme Court to monitor the activities of lower courts can help reducing the backlog of cases, according to some legal experts.
Sources said there are now six judges for the Appellate Division, 97 judges for the High Court Division and around 1,600 judges for the lower courts across the country.
A total of 16,647 cases were pending with the Appellate Division of Supreme Court till December 31, 2012 after disposal of 94 cases in that month. The number of cases at the Appellate Division was 16,219 in November, 2012, SC sources said.
An SC study report earlier showed that the number of pending cases at the Appellate Division was 14,474 until May 31 last year. A total of 585 cases were registered with the Appellate Division in May that year while 131 were disposed of in that month, says the report.
In contrast with the current situation at the Appellate Division, the number of pending cases at the High Court Division had decreased to 280,000 in May last year from 353,000 in September 2010.
SC sources said that a total of 294,978 cases were pending with the High Court till November 30, 2012, after 5,505 cases were filed and 33 were revived and 2,874 were disposed of in this month.
In October 2012, the number of total pending cases at the High Court was 292,313.
Now, a total of 465 death reference cases are pending with the High Court Division, as 145 death reference cases were disposed of in 2012, SC sources said.
Among the death reference cases, 24 were sent to the High Court for hearing after preparing their paper books.
Besides, 18 cases were made ready for sending them to the HC benches for hearing. In 2011, the High Court has disposed of total 64 death reference cases.
Now, the death references of 2008 are being heard and disposed of at the High Court and only seven death references of 2007 are pending with this court. The death reference cases are heard and disposed of serially from the previous years, sources said, adding that four separate benches of the High Court hear and dispose of death reference cases.
According to sources, a total of 2,132,046 cases were pending with all the courts of the country including the Appellate and High Court Division till December 31, 2011.
A total of 1,083,827 cases were filed with all the courts of the country and a total of 948,689 cases were disposed of in 2011.
In that year, the Appellate Division had disposed of 1,859 cases, as 9,141 cases were filed with

this division, and 12,441 cases along with the previous cases were pending with it.
The High Court Division had disposed of 68,425 cases as 45,084 cases were filed with this court and total 279,923 cases were pending with this court in 2011.
The District and Sessions judges' courts had disposed of 207,477 cases, as 327,759 cases were filed with those courts and a total of 1,076,164 cases along with previous cases were remaining pending with these courts in 2011.
A total of 706,061cases were filed with the magistrates' courts across the country in 2011. The magistrates' courts had disposed of 671,628 cases and 763,518 cases were pending with those courts in that year.
Earlier in 2010, the number of total pending cases at the Appellate Division was 9,141 after it had disposed of 1,583 cases. The number of pending cases at the High Court Division was 313,735 after it had disposed of 693,096 cases in that year.
The District and Sessions Judges' courts across the country had disposed of 281,251 cases, as 362,563 cases were filed in 2010.
In that year (2010), 748,822 cases were pending with the District and Sessions judges' courts of the country.
The magistrates' courts had disposed of 1,061,252 cases, as 1,167,335 cases were filed in those courts the same year (2010). At the end of 2010, the number of total pending cases at the magistrates' courts was 1,942,163, according to sources.
Chief Justice Muzammel Hossain on May 18, 2011 at a felicitation meeting on the occasion of his first day in office had said, "Our courts are now over-burdened with a backlog of cases for instance, the number of pending cases before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh was 8,085 in September 2010, while today the number of pending cases has risen to [approximately] 10,575."
In a written statement, he had noted, "I have seen from my experience that the main dispute in many cases, particularly in the field of writ matters, customs duties and quashment of certain types of criminal proceedings, rests on a common point of law, which can be dealt with by analogous hearing and common judgment so long as issues of the individual cases are not dissimilar. We have to take measures to bring up those cases for hearing so as to adjudicate those cases quickly and expeditiously in the interest of justice."
The chief justice had said, "The courts will now have to be more pragmatic in adjudicating cases particularly in reducing the backlogs and generally case management."
Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Barrister Shafique Ahmed on January 13 told the media at the Press Information Department that the present government has appointed 10 judges to the Appellate Division, appointed 61 judges to the High Court Division and appointed 331 judges to the lower courts for disposing of the cases quickly.
A huge backlog of criminal cases will be reduced if the government can amend the Criminal Procedure of Code (CrPC) to introduce alternative dispute regulation (ADR) for disposing of criminal cases through compromise outside the court, he said.
The government has already amended Civil Procedure of Code (CPC) to introduce ADR system for disposing of the civil cases, the minister said, adding that around two million of cases are now pending with the courts across the country.
Replying to a question from The Daily Star, Shafique Ahmed said that the government will take steps for appointing judges to the vacant posts of judge of the Appellate

Division if the chief justice initiates the process to this effect.
Attorney General Mahbubey Alam recently told The Daily Star that efficient judges have to be appointed in the High Court to quickly hear and dispose of cases in order to increase the rate of disposal of cases and to reduce the backlog of cases.
cases03A commission can be formed with some retired Supreme Court judges under the leadership of the chief justice to monitor the performances of the High Court judges, he said.
The attorney general said the commission will oversee whether the judges sit in the benches, deliver orders and judgments in the cases, and sign them (orders and verdicts) on time, he said.
He said that the rate of disposal of cases at the High Court has not increased, although a good number of judges were appointed to this court in recent years.
“I have seen earlier that a High Court judge has heard and disposed of at least 20 important civil cases in a day, which I don't see now-a-days,” he added.
Mahbubey Alam feels that the lower courts of the country are disposing of cases more in comparison to that of the High Court.
The lower courts have a binding of hearing and disposing of a particular number of cases in every month and they almost do that, he said.
The attorney general said the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) might not be very effective in increasing the number of disposed of cases and to reduce the backlog of cases.
ADR is system through which some petty cases can be settled through compromise between the parties of a case in mediation of lawyers outside the courts.
Mahbubey Alam said it is not specific which cases can be settled through ADR.
Criminal cases cannot be settled through compromise outside the courts, he said, adding the tax-dodging cases can be settled through ADR system, but it may cause loss of state money.
Advocate Khandker Mahbub Hossain, vice chairman of Bangladesh Bar Council, said the pile of pending cases at the Appellate Division could be reduced by constituting two separate benches with the existing judges.
"We have requested the chief justice to take measures to this end, but no steps were taken yet," he said adding that the litigants were suffering seriously for not disposing of their cases swiftly.
The Appellate Division is now operating with six judges in a single bench, while it requires at least three judges to form a bench, he said.

Star Archive Star Archive

Khandker Mahbub said there are some judges in the High Court division, who cannot hear and dispose of cases quickly and do not sign the verdicts on time, and therefore the pile of cases is growing higher.
The existing trend of the High Court to extend the orders of bail and stay on the cases several times a year is increasing the backlog of pending cases, he said, adding that this trend should be stopped.
Khandker Mahbub, also a former president of Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) said the government has kept around 200 judges of the lower courts in the administration on deputation for their (judge) own interest, hampering judicial functions at the courts.
Those judges should be sent to the courts to discharge judicial functions for reducing the backlog of pending cases, he added.
The SCBA on October 26, 2010 had adopted a resolution expressing annoyance over dillydallying in appointment of judges to the Appellate Division.
Earlier on July 9, 2009, the president had raised the number of posts of judges in the Appellate Division from 7 to 11, prior to disposing of some important cases including the one over the Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman murder and another on the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
cases01But due to retirement and appointment of several judges in about three and a half years, the Appellate Division now has six judges.
However, in the last 21 months, no new judges were appointed at the apex court, resulting in accumulation of cases and suffering litigants.
Supreme Court Registrar A K M Shamsul Islam told The Daily Star that the backlog of pending cases at the country's courts is growing higher day by day, although the rate of disposal of cases is increasing, because the number of filing cases is increasing.
Fair case management and close monitoring has enabled the High Court to reduce the backlog of pending cases at the High Court Division, he said, adding that the chief justice constitutes the HC benches in such a process that the cases are heard and disposed of substantially and gradually from the previous years.
He said the quick disposal of cases at the HC is ensuring justice for litigant people.
The SC registrar said the backlog of pending cases at the Appellate Division is increasing due shortage of judges and increase of number filing cases with this division.
............................................................................................
The writer is law correspondent for The Daily Star.

Comments

Backlog of cases

Star Archive Star Archive

A huge backlog of around 2.3 million cases is pending with the courts across the country including the Appellate Division and High Court Division of the Supreme Court (SC), causing immeasurable suffering to the litigants.
Although the number of judges and the rate of disposal of cases are increasing, the backlog is growing higher, since the number of filing of cases is increasing day by day due to growth of population, SC and the law ministry sources said.
Appointment of competent, experienced and honest judges at the courts, and establishing an independent secretariat for the Supreme Court to monitor the activities of lower courts can help reducing the backlog of cases, according to some legal experts.
Sources said there are now six judges for the Appellate Division, 97 judges for the High Court Division and around 1,600 judges for the lower courts across the country.
A total of 16,647 cases were pending with the Appellate Division of Supreme Court till December 31, 2012 after disposal of 94 cases in that month. The number of cases at the Appellate Division was 16,219 in November, 2012, SC sources said.
An SC study report earlier showed that the number of pending cases at the Appellate Division was 14,474 until May 31 last year. A total of 585 cases were registered with the Appellate Division in May that year while 131 were disposed of in that month, says the report.
In contrast with the current situation at the Appellate Division, the number of pending cases at the High Court Division had decreased to 280,000 in May last year from 353,000 in September 2010.
SC sources said that a total of 294,978 cases were pending with the High Court till November 30, 2012, after 5,505 cases were filed and 33 were revived and 2,874 were disposed of in this month.
In October 2012, the number of total pending cases at the High Court was 292,313.
Now, a total of 465 death reference cases are pending with the High Court Division, as 145 death reference cases were disposed of in 2012, SC sources said.
Among the death reference cases, 24 were sent to the High Court for hearing after preparing their paper books.
Besides, 18 cases were made ready for sending them to the HC benches for hearing. In 2011, the High Court has disposed of total 64 death reference cases.
Now, the death references of 2008 are being heard and disposed of at the High Court and only seven death references of 2007 are pending with this court. The death reference cases are heard and disposed of serially from the previous years, sources said, adding that four separate benches of the High Court hear and dispose of death reference cases.
According to sources, a total of 2,132,046 cases were pending with all the courts of the country including the Appellate and High Court Division till December 31, 2011.
A total of 1,083,827 cases were filed with all the courts of the country and a total of 948,689 cases were disposed of in 2011.
In that year, the Appellate Division had disposed of 1,859 cases, as 9,141 cases were filed with

this division, and 12,441 cases along with the previous cases were pending with it.
The High Court Division had disposed of 68,425 cases as 45,084 cases were filed with this court and total 279,923 cases were pending with this court in 2011.
The District and Sessions judges' courts had disposed of 207,477 cases, as 327,759 cases were filed with those courts and a total of 1,076,164 cases along with previous cases were remaining pending with these courts in 2011.
A total of 706,061cases were filed with the magistrates' courts across the country in 2011. The magistrates' courts had disposed of 671,628 cases and 763,518 cases were pending with those courts in that year.
Earlier in 2010, the number of total pending cases at the Appellate Division was 9,141 after it had disposed of 1,583 cases. The number of pending cases at the High Court Division was 313,735 after it had disposed of 693,096 cases in that year.
The District and Sessions Judges' courts across the country had disposed of 281,251 cases, as 362,563 cases were filed in 2010.
In that year (2010), 748,822 cases were pending with the District and Sessions judges' courts of the country.
The magistrates' courts had disposed of 1,061,252 cases, as 1,167,335 cases were filed in those courts the same year (2010). At the end of 2010, the number of total pending cases at the magistrates' courts was 1,942,163, according to sources.
Chief Justice Muzammel Hossain on May 18, 2011 at a felicitation meeting on the occasion of his first day in office had said, "Our courts are now over-burdened with a backlog of cases for instance, the number of pending cases before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh was 8,085 in September 2010, while today the number of pending cases has risen to [approximately] 10,575."
In a written statement, he had noted, "I have seen from my experience that the main dispute in many cases, particularly in the field of writ matters, customs duties and quashment of certain types of criminal proceedings, rests on a common point of law, which can be dealt with by analogous hearing and common judgment so long as issues of the individual cases are not dissimilar. We have to take measures to bring up those cases for hearing so as to adjudicate those cases quickly and expeditiously in the interest of justice."
The chief justice had said, "The courts will now have to be more pragmatic in adjudicating cases particularly in reducing the backlogs and generally case management."
Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Barrister Shafique Ahmed on January 13 told the media at the Press Information Department that the present government has appointed 10 judges to the Appellate Division, appointed 61 judges to the High Court Division and appointed 331 judges to the lower courts for disposing of the cases quickly.
A huge backlog of criminal cases will be reduced if the government can amend the Criminal Procedure of Code (CrPC) to introduce alternative dispute regulation (ADR) for disposing of criminal cases through compromise outside the court, he said.
The government has already amended Civil Procedure of Code (CPC) to introduce ADR system for disposing of the civil cases, the minister said, adding that around two million of cases are now pending with the courts across the country.
Replying to a question from The Daily Star, Shafique Ahmed said that the government will take steps for appointing judges to the vacant posts of judge of the Appellate

Division if the chief justice initiates the process to this effect.
Attorney General Mahbubey Alam recently told The Daily Star that efficient judges have to be appointed in the High Court to quickly hear and dispose of cases in order to increase the rate of disposal of cases and to reduce the backlog of cases.
cases03A commission can be formed with some retired Supreme Court judges under the leadership of the chief justice to monitor the performances of the High Court judges, he said.
The attorney general said the commission will oversee whether the judges sit in the benches, deliver orders and judgments in the cases, and sign them (orders and verdicts) on time, he said.
He said that the rate of disposal of cases at the High Court has not increased, although a good number of judges were appointed to this court in recent years.
“I have seen earlier that a High Court judge has heard and disposed of at least 20 important civil cases in a day, which I don't see now-a-days,” he added.
Mahbubey Alam feels that the lower courts of the country are disposing of cases more in comparison to that of the High Court.
The lower courts have a binding of hearing and disposing of a particular number of cases in every month and they almost do that, he said.
The attorney general said the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) might not be very effective in increasing the number of disposed of cases and to reduce the backlog of cases.
ADR is system through which some petty cases can be settled through compromise between the parties of a case in mediation of lawyers outside the courts.
Mahbubey Alam said it is not specific which cases can be settled through ADR.
Criminal cases cannot be settled through compromise outside the courts, he said, adding the tax-dodging cases can be settled through ADR system, but it may cause loss of state money.
Advocate Khandker Mahbub Hossain, vice chairman of Bangladesh Bar Council, said the pile of pending cases at the Appellate Division could be reduced by constituting two separate benches with the existing judges.
"We have requested the chief justice to take measures to this end, but no steps were taken yet," he said adding that the litigants were suffering seriously for not disposing of their cases swiftly.
The Appellate Division is now operating with six judges in a single bench, while it requires at least three judges to form a bench, he said.

Star Archive Star Archive

Khandker Mahbub said there are some judges in the High Court division, who cannot hear and dispose of cases quickly and do not sign the verdicts on time, and therefore the pile of cases is growing higher.
The existing trend of the High Court to extend the orders of bail and stay on the cases several times a year is increasing the backlog of pending cases, he said, adding that this trend should be stopped.
Khandker Mahbub, also a former president of Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) said the government has kept around 200 judges of the lower courts in the administration on deputation for their (judge) own interest, hampering judicial functions at the courts.
Those judges should be sent to the courts to discharge judicial functions for reducing the backlog of pending cases, he added.
The SCBA on October 26, 2010 had adopted a resolution expressing annoyance over dillydallying in appointment of judges to the Appellate Division.
Earlier on July 9, 2009, the president had raised the number of posts of judges in the Appellate Division from 7 to 11, prior to disposing of some important cases including the one over the Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman murder and another on the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
cases01But due to retirement and appointment of several judges in about three and a half years, the Appellate Division now has six judges.
However, in the last 21 months, no new judges were appointed at the apex court, resulting in accumulation of cases and suffering litigants.
Supreme Court Registrar A K M Shamsul Islam told The Daily Star that the backlog of pending cases at the country's courts is growing higher day by day, although the rate of disposal of cases is increasing, because the number of filing cases is increasing.
Fair case management and close monitoring has enabled the High Court to reduce the backlog of pending cases at the High Court Division, he said, adding that the chief justice constitutes the HC benches in such a process that the cases are heard and disposed of substantially and gradually from the previous years.
He said the quick disposal of cases at the HC is ensuring justice for litigant people.
The SC registrar said the backlog of pending cases at the Appellate Division is increasing due shortage of judges and increase of number filing cases with this division.
............................................................................................
The writer is law correspondent for The Daily Star.

Comments