Sundarbans & Forest

'Accidentally killing migratory birds not a crime'

A flock of birds fly past the Marine One helicopter with US President Donald Trump aboard, as he returns to the White House after a visit to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Washington, US, December 21, 2017. Photo: Reuters

Energy companies and other businesses that accidentally kill migratory birds will no longer be criminally prosecuted, the Trump administration said Friday in a decision hailed by industry but denounced by environmental groups.

The decision, in a legal memo from the US Department of Interior, reverses a longstanding practice at the agency as well as a last-minute rule released by the outgoing Obama administration. It comes after several appeals courts ruled that the government was interpreting a century-old law aimed at protecting birds too broadly.

"Christmas came early for bird killers," said David O'Neill, chief conservation officer for the National Audubon Society. "The White House is parting ways with more than 100 years of conservation legacy."

The administration's move is the latest of several actions Trump has taken to weaken environmental protections viewed as burdensome to industry, including shrinking the size of two national monuments in Utah and reconsidering protections for the Greater Sage Grouse, a Western bird whose population has dropped precipitously amid threats to its habitat.

In the legal opinion issued late Friday, the Interior Department's principal deputy solicitor, Daniel Jorjani, said that a 1918 law that officials have used to prosecute those who kill birds "incidentally" as part of doing business was really aimed at preventing poaching and hunting without a license.

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act "applies only to direct and affirmative purposeful actions that reduce migratory birds, their eggs, or their nests, by killing or capturing, to human control," Jorjani wrote.

His opinion reverses a January effort by outgoing former President Barack Obama to encode the Interior Department's ability to prosecute those who accidentally kill migratory birds, which never went into effect as it was suspended shortly after Trump came into office.

But it also makes clear that law enforcement officials working for the department are not to attempt to file criminal charges in such cases, which Jorjani said would be a change in the agency's practices.

Kathleen Sgamma, president of the Western Energy Alliance, said oil and gas companies "protect birds every day" and accused the Obama administration of abusing the law by making companies criminally liable.

"The MBTA was enacted by Congress as a criminal statute to stop the hunting and poaching of migratory birds," she said in a statement. "It was not meant to address activities that do not directly kill birds."

But environmentalists predicted the Trump administration's decision meant no accountability for the deaths of otherwise unprotected birds, from songbirds to falcons.

The Interior Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment form Reuters.

Comments

'Accidentally killing migratory birds not a crime'

A flock of birds fly past the Marine One helicopter with US President Donald Trump aboard, as he returns to the White House after a visit to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Washington, US, December 21, 2017. Photo: Reuters

Energy companies and other businesses that accidentally kill migratory birds will no longer be criminally prosecuted, the Trump administration said Friday in a decision hailed by industry but denounced by environmental groups.

The decision, in a legal memo from the US Department of Interior, reverses a longstanding practice at the agency as well as a last-minute rule released by the outgoing Obama administration. It comes after several appeals courts ruled that the government was interpreting a century-old law aimed at protecting birds too broadly.

"Christmas came early for bird killers," said David O'Neill, chief conservation officer for the National Audubon Society. "The White House is parting ways with more than 100 years of conservation legacy."

The administration's move is the latest of several actions Trump has taken to weaken environmental protections viewed as burdensome to industry, including shrinking the size of two national monuments in Utah and reconsidering protections for the Greater Sage Grouse, a Western bird whose population has dropped precipitously amid threats to its habitat.

In the legal opinion issued late Friday, the Interior Department's principal deputy solicitor, Daniel Jorjani, said that a 1918 law that officials have used to prosecute those who kill birds "incidentally" as part of doing business was really aimed at preventing poaching and hunting without a license.

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act "applies only to direct and affirmative purposeful actions that reduce migratory birds, their eggs, or their nests, by killing or capturing, to human control," Jorjani wrote.

His opinion reverses a January effort by outgoing former President Barack Obama to encode the Interior Department's ability to prosecute those who accidentally kill migratory birds, which never went into effect as it was suspended shortly after Trump came into office.

But it also makes clear that law enforcement officials working for the department are not to attempt to file criminal charges in such cases, which Jorjani said would be a change in the agency's practices.

Kathleen Sgamma, president of the Western Energy Alliance, said oil and gas companies "protect birds every day" and accused the Obama administration of abusing the law by making companies criminally liable.

"The MBTA was enacted by Congress as a criminal statute to stop the hunting and poaching of migratory birds," she said in a statement. "It was not meant to address activities that do not directly kill birds."

But environmentalists predicted the Trump administration's decision meant no accountability for the deaths of otherwise unprotected birds, from songbirds to falcons.

The Interior Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment form Reuters.

Comments

স্বাস্থ্যসেবা সংস্কার

ভারতের ভিসা নিষেধাজ্ঞা: দেশের স্বাস্থ্যসেবা সংস্কারের এখনই সময়

প্রতি বছর প্রায় সাড়ে তিন লাখ বাংলাদেশি ভারতে চিকিৎসা নিতে যান। ভিসা বিধিনিষেধ দেশের স্বাস্থ্য খাতে সমস্যাগুলোর সমাধান ও বিদেশে যাওয়া রোগীদের দেশে চিকিৎসা দেওয়ার সুযোগ এনে দিয়েছে।

১ ঘণ্টা আগে