The Birth of a Panopticon State
Photo: Kazi Tahsin Agaz Apurbo
When the Awami League came to power in 2008, it was amidst the backdrop of a real possibility of military rule entrenching once more a democracy that had barely had two decades of shelf-life. They brought with them a futuristic fervour that the nation didn't yet know it wanted. Talks of a 'Digital Bangladesh' superseded what were arguably more pressing matters at the time, such as restoring any semblance of a functioning democracy, stopping the slow but steady tide of land being dispossessed from the poor and the minorities and the centuries unchecked violence perpetrated on women despite the presence of female heads-of-state for the past twenty years.
At the same time, it is not unreasonable to think that a 'digital' country (whatever that may mean) may be able to succinctly channel its technology in order to solve those very problems. But as it turned out, the futuristic rhetoric manifested itself mostly through the availability of social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter or, in the darker corners, Tumblr. But here, as in most cases, the true potential of the Bangladeshi citizen came to the forefront. Where the state may have come up short in its promises, the average Bangladeshi more than made up for it with their penchant to learn and navigate around the technological terrain for their self-interest. We now have a thriving online community that is no longer Dhaka-centric; we have thousands of small and large businesses operating on social media sites and we are even not averse to the odd revolution, as characterised by the role social media played in mobilising students to protest the implementation of tax on private universities.
So we've come to a point where a 'Digital Bangladesh' is on the horizon, but only because of the endeavours of the citizenry. Is this the kind of effervescent culture that the ruling party was hinting at when they came to power? It's prudent to catalogue, at this point, a few salient incidents that might sway one's opinion, whatever that may be. First on the list must be the very commendable job that Sajeeb Wazed has done in order to uphold net neutrality, which is vital in a growing economy such as ours. Second, would be the equally commendable job that Tarana Halim is doing in introducing faster internet and improved service. Now, let's look at some of the less than pleasant incidents that have taken place- surveillance over social media has grown to the point that a Jahangir Nagar University teacher was jailed for three years for a status update and a very public Facebook page owner remanded; the month long ban over the more popular forms of social media such as Facebook, for which the official reason was to prevent attacks in the aftermath of the war crimes verdicts.
Government control over the internet in developing countries is nothing new. Brazil blocked Whatsapp for two days in the past month and before that there was a long-standing ban on Facebook in Thailand under the military-backed regime. Facebook remains banned in China. The narrative takes on a different outlook once we address all the facts together- yes, the state is very much interested in encouraging the growth of a digital Bangladesh, but it is a certain kind of digitisation that is being pursued; one that aims to allow a particular discourse over others through the very real consequences of surveillance. Whether this strategy remains feasible in the long-term is for another day; but for right now, someone, somewhere, is probably watching.
Note: The Panopticon refers to an institutional building designed by Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century. The concept of the design allows inmates of an institution to be observed by a watchman without the inmates being able to tell whether they are being watched or not.
The writer is a student of Knox University, Chicago, USA.
Comments