The critical question of cyber safety is at the forefront.
Press freedom must be protected from the concerted disinformation patronised by some platforms and actors.
Beyond laws, society must cultivate both physical and digital spaces for inclusive, civil discourse among its citizens.
Bangladesh must repeal the CSA to safeguard the rights of its citizens.
The Cyber Security Act came into effect last year, replacing the controversial Digital Security Act
Awami League has always found justification in the Nietzschean theory of cultivating or “inventing” enemies
Crimes against journalists do not happen in a vacuum.
The case against him and WikiLeaks is much more important for what it might entail for press freedom itself.
Is that how democracy works for us?
Our recently published study has found several alarming factors contributing to declining academic freedom in the universities of Bangladesh.
Milton shows how the erroneous use of censorship laws have hindered progress even in the quest for scientific truth.
DSA’s new curbs and OTT draft rules give the opening
Government decision to engage in expatriate diplomacy to tackle negative propaganda raises a lot of questions.
To obtain the full potentials of the law, we must go beyond such perfunctory rituals and focus more on strategies to go ahead.
It is a matter of great misfortune, as well as of disappointment and uncertainty, that democracy in Bangladesh is practically absent now.
The draconian Digital Security Act (DSA) strikes again, and most worryingly, in collusion with communal bigotry.
Can citizens be told that their rights are now available because the executive branch of the state is offering them as a gift?
Will the amended Press Council Act further restrain free press?
Nothing but their own voices reaches them
