‘Britain didn't conquer India’

"Britain didn't conquer India…East India Company did. The company, which was only answerable to shareholders, unleashed a beast on the world. Ten years after the Battle of Plassey, the company was being run by 35 people in London," British historian and writer William Dalrymple told The Daily Star yesterday. The noted historian is in town to attend the Hay Festival Dhaka 2014.

Dalrymple embarked on the literary scene with his travel books – In Xanadu and City of Djinns. But he earned a solid global fandom with his history books – White Mughals and The Last Mughal. His latest book Return of a King: The Battle for Afghanistan has also received rave reviews.

His history books read like novels. Why?

"Because it's 'narrative history'. The narrative form is ancient whereas the novel form has developed much later. My writing process is like Chinese cooking; most of the time is invested in mise en place: chopping up ingredients, organising them, and at the very end when all the things are ready to go, you start the cooking. I write a book once every four or five years and most of that time goes into researching and preparing what exactly I'm going to write. I'd have over 400 pages of dateline… lots and lots of index cards. I'm a micro-planner. Clarity and control are very crucial if you're going to write about history," he explained.

Though his books read like fiction, nothing is made up in them. "I can't write 'It was a bright, sunny day' unless records actually say it was a bright, sunny day."  

Perhaps the reason his history books have found huge success in South Asia is the dearth of this particular form in this region.

Dalrymple agreed: "History books written in South Asia are mostly academic and analytical. The British are good at narrative history. It's only been a decade that we saw brilliant literary non-fiction coming out of South Asia."

White Mughals is essentially about the British officers of East India Company coming to India and falling in love with it and its culture in the 18th and early 19th century while The Last Mughal describes the ugly face of racism and hatred towards the natives during the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857. Return of a King, a re-telling of the first Anglo-Afghan war (1839-42), presents uncanny parallels between the British invasion of Afghanistan in 1839 and the post-9/11 occupation of Afghanistan by the West. Did he intentionally present an overarching theme here: history repeating itself and 'us' [East] and 'them' [West] not necessarily acting any wiser?

"Yes, the British wasted resources and ravaged Afghanistan during the war in 1839-42, and they humiliated themselves. Modern warfare is even more expensive. The human cost of war is immensely tragic. The reality is that Afghanistan is now a democracy but I'd say war was perhaps avoidable," he said.

Dalrymple is currently working on his next book – a prequel to White Mughals, which will trace the rise of the East India Company, chronicling the relatively "unwritten time" between the fall of the Mughals and the rise of the British.