Politics
BETWEEN THE LINES

Dynasty needs to explain

I am sorry to revert to the emergency yet again, over two successive weeks. R.K. Dhawan, Mrs. Indira Gandhi's confidante, has disclosed that Sonia Gandhi had no qualms about the emergency. This is contrary to what I had heard when the emergency was imposed. It was reported that both her husband, Rajiv Gandhi, and she were thinking to return to Italy to bring up their children in a "free atmosphere."

Dhawan's observation about Sonia Gandhi makes all the more obligatory for her to explain her stand on the emergency. Even after 40 years, the dynasty is not clearly coming out on the switching off the lights of democracy. The dynasty alone is responsible for what had happened. Mrs. Indira Gandhi was indicted by the Allahabad High Court in a poll petition and unseated for misusing the official machinery.

The Supreme Court gave a reprieve. Dhawan's remarks show that there was no regret in the dynasty. However, Dr Manmohan Singh tried to make up for the dynasty's deliberate silence. It is but fair that the sooner it apologies to the nation, the better it would be for them and the country.

Dhawan has, however, come a long way from the deposition before the Shah Commission, appointed by the Janata government to go into the excesses of the emergency. He had deposed before the Commission that he was not willing to say anything against the dynasty and put the entire blame on Siddharth Shankar Ray, then West Bengal chief minister.

In the light of Dhawan's revelations, the case should be reopened. More than that, there needs to be a probe on how the institutions were diluted and the power got concentrated on Indira Gandhi. BJP's senior leader L.K. Advani's warning that the emergency can return becomes significant. He has not named anybody but the obvious reference is to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has made all other institutions irrelevant, and reposes faith in the PMO. In other words, the PMO has become the real power centre.

I do not think that the emergency will be re-imposed because the amendments affected in the Constitution by the Janata government makes it impossible. Yet, conditions can be created which will suggest the emergency without any legal sanction.

The rule of Modi becomes ominous in the sense that no cabinet minister counts in the BJP government and the joint consultation by the cabinet is only on paper. All political parties should put their heads together to stall any emergency-like rule before it actually comes to exist.

If there was a one-person rule of Indira Gandhi a few decades ago, today it is that of Narendra Modi. Most newspapers and television channels have adapted themselves to his way of working, if not thinking, as they had done during Mrs. Gandhi's period.

Against this background, the murder of a journalist in Madhya Pradesh, which is a better administered state in the country, does not surprise me. The reason was once again the same. The journalist, Sandeep Kothari, dared to cross the line which those, who represent the establishment, have drawn. Beyond that, the freedom of expression is not tolerated because it challenges the interest of entrenched elements.

The 44-year-old Kothari disclosed how the sand mafia was operating with the assistance of the police. That is the reason why they said that Kothari's death was not connected with journalism. The reading is, however, more harrowing than what has come to light. It is apparent that the police was in league with the sand mafia's illegal doings.

Some activists raised their voice many months ago. But the authorities took no action. The sand mafia went on increasing the area from where they filled trucks with sand throughout the day. They once operated at night. But as they were able to 'buy' more and more functionaries, over the years they shed fear or hesitation.

Kothari had gone missing from his home in Katangi town of Balaghat district in Madhya Pradesh on a Friday, a couple of weeks ago. His family members had lodged a missing person's complaint the next day, Saturday. However, reports said that three youths, who were closely linked to the sand mafia, had kidnapped and killed Kothari over his refusal to withdraw a court case. The report added that Kothari was out on bail for the last two months in a rape case.

During investigation, the police rounded up the three young men from Katangi on Sunday and they confessed that they had killed Kothari, set him on fire and buried him in the forests in Nagpur district. The police are yet to establish whether Kothari was murdered and then burned or if he was burned alive and buried.

Since all the facts about the case have not come to light, it is difficult to apportion the blame. But there is no denying of Kothari's killing and his journalistic credentials. That the corporate sector has become more influential and more demanding than before is not something which can be denied. It is intelligent enough not to vitiate fundamental rights like the freedom of expression. They have now roughnecks at their command to fix journalists.

Kothari was a victim. Burning him alive shows how the establishment, on one hand, and the mafia, on the other, are indulging in more heinous cruelty to instill fear. This is what the political parties are accepting. Because of petty rivalries, they are allowing the democratic polity to be mutilated.

The writer is an eminent Indian columnist.

Comments

BETWEEN THE LINES

Dynasty needs to explain

I am sorry to revert to the emergency yet again, over two successive weeks. R.K. Dhawan, Mrs. Indira Gandhi's confidante, has disclosed that Sonia Gandhi had no qualms about the emergency. This is contrary to what I had heard when the emergency was imposed. It was reported that both her husband, Rajiv Gandhi, and she were thinking to return to Italy to bring up their children in a "free atmosphere."

Dhawan's observation about Sonia Gandhi makes all the more obligatory for her to explain her stand on the emergency. Even after 40 years, the dynasty is not clearly coming out on the switching off the lights of democracy. The dynasty alone is responsible for what had happened. Mrs. Indira Gandhi was indicted by the Allahabad High Court in a poll petition and unseated for misusing the official machinery.

The Supreme Court gave a reprieve. Dhawan's remarks show that there was no regret in the dynasty. However, Dr Manmohan Singh tried to make up for the dynasty's deliberate silence. It is but fair that the sooner it apologies to the nation, the better it would be for them and the country.

Dhawan has, however, come a long way from the deposition before the Shah Commission, appointed by the Janata government to go into the excesses of the emergency. He had deposed before the Commission that he was not willing to say anything against the dynasty and put the entire blame on Siddharth Shankar Ray, then West Bengal chief minister.

In the light of Dhawan's revelations, the case should be reopened. More than that, there needs to be a probe on how the institutions were diluted and the power got concentrated on Indira Gandhi. BJP's senior leader L.K. Advani's warning that the emergency can return becomes significant. He has not named anybody but the obvious reference is to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has made all other institutions irrelevant, and reposes faith in the PMO. In other words, the PMO has become the real power centre.

I do not think that the emergency will be re-imposed because the amendments affected in the Constitution by the Janata government makes it impossible. Yet, conditions can be created which will suggest the emergency without any legal sanction.

The rule of Modi becomes ominous in the sense that no cabinet minister counts in the BJP government and the joint consultation by the cabinet is only on paper. All political parties should put their heads together to stall any emergency-like rule before it actually comes to exist.

If there was a one-person rule of Indira Gandhi a few decades ago, today it is that of Narendra Modi. Most newspapers and television channels have adapted themselves to his way of working, if not thinking, as they had done during Mrs. Gandhi's period.

Against this background, the murder of a journalist in Madhya Pradesh, which is a better administered state in the country, does not surprise me. The reason was once again the same. The journalist, Sandeep Kothari, dared to cross the line which those, who represent the establishment, have drawn. Beyond that, the freedom of expression is not tolerated because it challenges the interest of entrenched elements.

The 44-year-old Kothari disclosed how the sand mafia was operating with the assistance of the police. That is the reason why they said that Kothari's death was not connected with journalism. The reading is, however, more harrowing than what has come to light. It is apparent that the police was in league with the sand mafia's illegal doings.

Some activists raised their voice many months ago. But the authorities took no action. The sand mafia went on increasing the area from where they filled trucks with sand throughout the day. They once operated at night. But as they were able to 'buy' more and more functionaries, over the years they shed fear or hesitation.

Kothari had gone missing from his home in Katangi town of Balaghat district in Madhya Pradesh on a Friday, a couple of weeks ago. His family members had lodged a missing person's complaint the next day, Saturday. However, reports said that three youths, who were closely linked to the sand mafia, had kidnapped and killed Kothari over his refusal to withdraw a court case. The report added that Kothari was out on bail for the last two months in a rape case.

During investigation, the police rounded up the three young men from Katangi on Sunday and they confessed that they had killed Kothari, set him on fire and buried him in the forests in Nagpur district. The police are yet to establish whether Kothari was murdered and then burned or if he was burned alive and buried.

Since all the facts about the case have not come to light, it is difficult to apportion the blame. But there is no denying of Kothari's killing and his journalistic credentials. That the corporate sector has become more influential and more demanding than before is not something which can be denied. It is intelligent enough not to vitiate fundamental rights like the freedom of expression. They have now roughnecks at their command to fix journalists.

Kothari was a victim. Burning him alive shows how the establishment, on one hand, and the mafia, on the other, are indulging in more heinous cruelty to instill fear. This is what the political parties are accepting. Because of petty rivalries, they are allowing the democratic polity to be mutilated.

The writer is an eminent Indian columnist.

Comments

‘জাতিসংঘ সনদের অধিকারবলে’ ভারতের আগ্রাসনের জবাব দেবে পাকিস্তান

তবে ভারত উত্তেজনা না বাড়ালে পাকিস্তান কোনো ‘দায়িত্বজ্ঞানহীন পদক্ষেপ’ না নেওয়ার প্রতিশ্রুতি দিয়েছে।

৩ ঘণ্টা আগে