Yes, we can afford to abandon coal, oil and gas

Over the last couple of years, inflation has caused a cost-of-living crisis across large parts of the world. Some fearmongers have used this hardship to propagate rhetoric that climate change action is unaffordable and running against the interests of ordinary people. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Propagating a "Greens vs Poor" narrative is divisive, and it is often used to mask short-term, profit-driven self-interest. The only stable, economically sustainable future is one of energy security, resilience to disasters, well-funded coordinated recovery from them, and ultimately, a cap on temperature rise at 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and gas, are a major driver of the cost-of-living crisis, which is stretching billions of household budgets to the breaking point. Prices have swung wildly, as they frequently do, driven higher by uncertainty and conflict. In turn, this pushes up the costs of transport, food, electricity, and basic household necessities. In some heavily fossil fuel-dependent countries, household bills rose as much as $1,000 in 2022 due to fossil fuel energy costs.

Read more

Closing the sustainable energy gaps in Asia and the Pacific

Consumer costs will rise even further and economic growth will slow as climate impacts become more intense, according to economic authorities, such as the United States Treasury, the Reserve Bank of India and the European Central Bank. High energy prices also shrink profit margins for businesses and hurt economic growth. They also shrink profit margins for businesses, hurt economic growth, and impede the right to energy access across the world.

This comes as climate disasters are also getting worse in every country. This year will likely be the hottest for 125,000 years. More destructive storms, unpredictable rains and floods, heatwaves, and droughts are already causing massive economic damage and affecting hundreds of millions of people across the world, costing them their lives and livelihoods.

The fossil fuel taps can't be turned off overnight, but there are a lot of opportunities for action not currently being taken. For example, in 2022, governments spent over $7 trillion in taxpayers' money or borrowings on fossil fuel subsidies. These subsidies fail to protect the real incomes of the poorest households and increase developing country debt burdens. This resource could have been used to improve health care, build infrastructure—including renewable energy and grids—and expand social programmes to alleviate poverty. Done responsibly, a phase-out of such subsidies would actually help the poorest and improve the economies of the countries now dependent on them.

Read more

How can we bring our canals back from the dead?

This year, at UN Climate Change, we conducted a Global Stocktake on climate action up to now. It has indicated clearly that progress is too slow. But it also revealed that we have many tools to speed up climate action now, which will simultaneously build stronger economies. We have the knowledge and tools to accelerate this transition while ensuring it is fair and just, and leaves no one behind.

Billions of people need their governments to pick up this toolbox and put it to work. That includes switching billions of dollars from investments in new fossil fuel production to renewable energy—which will provide stable, reliable and lower-priced energy to propel economic growth. This is about both demand and supply. Those of us that demand energy to turn our lights on need to be provided with clean options to do it.

Read more

Is carbon offsetting a good climate solution?

There is cause for optimism, if governments come to this year's climate change conference—COP28—in Dubai with a spirit of cooperation and a laser-focus on solutions. At COP28, we can agree on tripling the world's renewable energy capacity. We can double energy efficiency. We can show we are doubling finance to help countries adapt to climate impacts and centre it in national planning. We can make the climate loss and damage fund a reality that helps deliver climate justice. And we can deliver old promises on financing the transition, and outline how we are going to fund the next steps.

One moment, one meeting, won't change everything. But we can capture the future in the directions that we set this year, and provide the plan for how national commitments can deliver in 2025.

I refuse to let fear-mongering pull a hood over my eyes, and you shouldn't either.

Simon Stiell is the executive secretary at UN Climate Change.

Views expressed in this article are the author's own.

Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries and analyses by experts and professionals. To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.