Philosophy’s role in bridging societal divides
World Philosophy Day, officially recognised by UNESCO in 2002, celebrates philosophy's power to foster dialogue, critical inquiry, and intercultural understanding. Observed annually on the third Thursday of November, the 2024 theme, "Philosophy: Bridging Social Gaps," underscores philosophy's role in fostering empathy, challenging entrenched ideologies, and promoting dialogue across diverse perspectives. In a world marked by societal divides, philosophy stands as a crucial tool in confronting issues of justice, inequality, and community. UNESCO's observance invites us to view philosophy not just as an academic discipline but as a means of connecting humanity across political, economic, and cultural boundaries. As social polarisation threatens societal cohesion, philosophy offers a space for introspection, dialogue, and the critical examination of dominant and meta-narratives. It urges us to question assumptions, reflect on shared values, and engage in conversations that bridge cultural and ideological divides. In the face of global crises and local inequalities, philosophical traditions offer pathways to greater understanding, cooperation, and collective action, underscoring philosophy's enduring relevance in shaping a more just world, without resting on its laurels.
Philosophy's engagement with issues of social fragmentation resonates deeply with the literary and hermeneutic turns that reshaped 20th-century thought. Paul de Man's assertion that philosophy is "an endless reflection on its own destruction at the hands of literature" captures this shift. By embracing deconstructive inquiry, philosophy is compelled to question its foundational assumptions, fostering introspection that strengthens its capacity to address complex social issues. In this self-critical light, philosophy mirrors literature's interpretive openness and inexhaustible reading practices, embracing Barthes' ethos of the "writerly text" as it moves away from the prescriptive "readerly text." This allows philosophy to examine and dismantle its own paradigms, enhancing its responsiveness to human complexities with agility and empathy. For instance, Lyotard's concept of the "loss of metanarratives" challenges the overarching, universalising stories that once provided coherence to society, advocating instead for localised, plural narratives that reflect diverse experiences and perspectives. Similarly, Adorno's "negative dialectics" calls for a rejection of simplified synthesis, insisting that philosophy must remain open to contradiction and tension rather than resolving them into harmonious conclusions. Both thinkers exemplify how philosophical inquiry can critically engage with and deconstruct its own foundational assumptions, fostering a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of the world.
For all latest news, follow The Daily Star's Google News channel. In today's world, philosophy may seem an unlikely contender in bridging social divides, given the dominance of doxa—the unquestioned common sense that shapes daily life. Philosophy's capacity to challenge prevailing ideologies may appear as hindered as Baudelaire's albatross, whose grand wings, suited for the open skies, become heavy and awkward on the deck of the ship. Pierre Bourdieu's concept of doxa describes ideologies that normalise social structures, making them appear natural and inevitable. Combined with Lukács' theory of reification, which objectifies social relations into seemingly fixed realities, this worldview stifles critical examination of power relations and social inequalities. Similar to this albatross (unlike Coleridge's, which has more mystical and moral implications), philosophy possesses a far-reaching vision, yet when confined to the restrictive frameworks of doxa and reification, its grandeur risks being diminished by the weight of societal conformity. Moreover, axioms in philosophy create a double bind by both supporting and restricting inquiry. They provide a structured foundation, offering coherence and enabling systematic exploration of complex ideas. However, they can also stifle critical thinking by constraining perspectives, fostering dogmatism, and oversimplifying nuanced issues. This double bind—the tension between needing foundational principles and the risk of limiting openness to alternative views—highlights a central challenge in philosophical inquiry: balancing the clarity axioms with a critical stance that questions these very foundations.
Philosophy counters these constructs through reflective consciousness and critical inquiry. Michel Foucault's concept of episteme governs the intellectual frameworks that define truth in society, shaping what is accepted as knowledge. His archaeology of knowledge exposes the historical layers of discourse, revealing how power structures shape societal truths. His genealogy of knowledge traces the historical evolution of concepts, illustrating the coevolution of power and knowledge. These tools unsettle the "naturalised" status quo, creating space for alternative possibilities within the interplay of foundational and antifoundational knowledge—a dynamic rooted in the insights of early thinkers like Parmenides, who explored the fixity of reality, and Heraclitus, who emphasised flux or perpetual change.
Alain Badiou's concept of "truth as a hole in knowledge" suggests that truth is not merely an addition to existing knowledge but a disruptive force that reshapes our understanding. This is vividly illustrated by the famous debate between Einstein and Bohr on quantum mechanics. Bohr's probabilistic interpretation revealed the limitations of both Newtonian and Einsteinian physics, pointing to an inherent indeterminacy in reality. Einstein, however, resisted this view, famously declaring, "God does not play dice with the world." Their clash embodies a profound rupture in knowledge, where quantum mechanics revolutionised our understanding of the universe, challenging established epistemological frameworks and highlighting the disruptive nature of truth. This shift toward an uncertain, probabilistic worldview aligned with Thomas Kuhn's paradigm shift in the theory of scientific revolutions and Stephen Jay Gould's "punctuated equilibrium," revealing that knowledge evolves through the tension between competing epistemes. For Badiou, quantum mechanics represents an "event," a transformative insight that reveals new truths and destabilises prior frameworks, echoing Popper, Saussure, and Pierce. Popper's philosophy of scientific falsifiability emphasises that theories must be testable and open to being proven false, promoting the idea that knowledge is always provisional. In contrast, Saussure's structuralism argues that meaning is not inherent but arises from the arbitrary relationship between signs (the signifier) and their meanings (the signified), constructed through social conventions. Peirce, on the other hand, presents a triadic semiotic model in which meaning is dynamic, shaped by the relationship between the sign, its object, and the interpretant, with an ongoing, fallible process of interpretation. While Popper focuses on the falsifiability of scientific theories, Saussure and Peirce focus on the evolving, interpretive nature of meaning within language and signs.
Philosophy's role, once central to intellectual and ethical discourse, has been marginalised over time, particularly as universities prioritise market-driven pursuits. Bill Readings, in The University in Ruins, critiques how economic imperatives have overshadowed philosophy's critical role in fostering ethical discourse, relegating it to the sidelines. However, it has been proven time and again that a renewed commitment to philosophy can bridge social divides, fostering a Socratic dialogue that promotes critical thinking and ethical reflection on societal norms even outside the ivory towers of academia. Philosophy's potential to address social justice issues and challenge globalised power structures that perpetuate inequality is unfathomable. Philosophy has adapted and advanced through ongoing intellectual developments in ontology (the nature of existence), epistemology (the nature of knowledge), and axiology (the study of values, including aesthetics and ethics). These fields function as a trident, each prong probing a different dimension of human experience. Ontology addresses the foundational question of "what is," epistemology explores how we come to know, and axiology examines the value systems that shape our judgments. Together, these areas form a cohesive framework for analysing complex issues, guiding philosophy's capacity to adapt to contemporary challenges and continue fostering critical inquiry into the nature of existence, knowledge, and values in a rapidly changing world.
In science, particularly in physics, mathematics, and statistics, pioneers like Heisenberg, Einstein, Bohr, Gödel, and Fisher introduced philosophical challenges that questioned conventional understandings of causality, certainty, and knowledge. Heisenberg's "uncertainty principle" and Einstein's "theory of relativity" questioned the nature of reality and certainty, while Gödel's "incompleteness theorem" exposed interpretive complexities and limitations within formal systems. Fisher's innovations in statistical inference added further dimensions, emphasising the role of probability and interpretation in knowledge production. These developments dismantled the positivist "clockwork universe" and introduced a worldview grounded in probabilistic, inferential reasoning, expanding philosophical reflection on knowledge and truth. Furthering this philosophical reach, superstring theory seeks to reconcile the super grand scales of general relativity and the super small scope of quantum mechanics, envisioning a universe unified in its fundamental forces. Similarly, quantum entanglement, revealing a profound interconnectedness among particles, serves as a metaphor for the interconnectivity of modern societies. Together, these insights challenge established hierarchies and prompt new philosophical reflections on truth, interdependence, and knowledge.
These scientific advances resonate with 20th and 21st-century philosophical movements, where thinkers began challenging the certainty of rational knowledge. Postmodern and post-structuralist philosophers like Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari emphasised the fluid, contingent, and socially constructed nature of truth and reality. Deleuze and Guattari, for instance, rejected hierarchical structures in favour of a rhizomatic model of knowledge, where multiple, non-linear connections shape understanding and societal organisation. This aligns with the collapse of certainty in science, loss of metanarrative in literary theory, and social research, in which unpredictability challenges conventional norms. The boundaries among the humanities, social sciences, and the sciences have increasingly blurred, reflecting a growing recognition that complex social issues cannot be adequately understood through isolated disciplines. As these fields converge, they provide a more holistic approach to understanding human agency, ethics, and the structures that govern societies, revealing the interconnectedness of knowledge and its application to real-world challenges.
Edward O Wilson's concept of consilience—the idea that all knowledge, regardless of its disciplinary origin, can ultimately be unified—offers a powerful framework for understanding this convergence. In this sense, the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences, once seen as separate realms, now coalesce around shared insights that push the boundaries of traditional thought and knowledge. This re-constellation is attuned to the nuances captured in Kristeva's intertextuality and Derrida's, différance trace, and dissemination. Kristeva's concept of intertextuality highlights how texts and disciplines (re)shape each other endlessly without being beholden to a single, fixed meaning or authoritative interpretation. Derrida's différance embodies the interplay of presence and absence, where meaning emerges only through a network of relational forces, shaped as much by what is deferred or missing as by what is directly present. This evolving, non-static meaning is enriched by trace, which introduces the ontological presence of absence—fragments of past contexts or meanings that leave an imprint, shaping current interpretations while pointing to something beyond immediate grasp. Finally, dissemination reflects how these interwoven traces and deferred meanings scatter across contexts, ensuring that meaning remains fluid and non-fixed. This interplay of presence and absence emphasises that understanding is not about locating a single truth but rather engaging with an open-ended matrix of interpretations that span disciplines and continuously reshape each other.
Understanding philosophy's role in bridging social gaps is incomplete without unpacking key ideologies such as commodity fetishism, false consciousness, creative destruction, simulacra, and spectacle, that discreetly obscure social inequalities. Marx's concept of commodity fetishism explains how commodities are imbued with intrinsic value, masking the labour and exploitation that produced them. This distortion fosters false consciousness, where the working class inadvertently supports a system that benefits the ruling class—reinforced by media, culture, and religion. Schumpeter's idea of creative destruction generates an illusion of progress, diverting attention away from the real sources of exploitation. Baudrillard's theory of simulacra asserts that representations replace authentic reality, constructing a hyperreality that obscures the true social conditions. Meanwhile, Debord's spectacle explores how media culture transforms social life into a performance, turning individuals into passive spectators of their own existence. Together, these ideologies reinforce capitalism's dominance, making it seem like an unchallengeable natural order.
In times when society fractures both with a resounding "bang" and a quiet "whimper," echoing Eliot's portrayal of a world ending not with grandeur but with silent collapse, philosophy stands as our last best hope. Amidst the rise of illiberal democracies and as "ignorant armies clash by night," to borrow from Matthew Arnold, philosophical inquiry remains essential, challenging entrenched ideologies and urging us toward empathy and justice. Philosophy's literary turn encourages relentless self-reflection, enabling it to navigate shifting social landscapes with agility and purpose, in concert with the consilience it builds across disciplines, working toward equifinality. As the gaps in society widen and the darkness deepens, Hegel's words resonate powerfully: "The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk." This imagery of wisdom emerging in times of darkness reminds us that, even as challenges mount, philosophy offers a guiding light, helping us reimagine a world founded on inclusivity and shared understanding.
Faridul Alam writes from New York City, US.
Views expressed in this article are the author's own.
Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries and analyses by experts and professionals. To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.
Comments