Views

Pathways to world rankings for private universities in Bangladesh

FILE VISUAL: SHAIKH SULTANA JAHAN BADHON

A review of the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings indicates that the number of Bangladeshi universities in the rankings are increasing. In 2025, as many as 15 universities are listed, whereas there were four universities in 2023 and two in 2022. Among them, about 50 percent (in 2025 and 2024) are private universities.

In the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings, there are 17 universities in 2025, whereas in 2024 and 2023, there were nine and five universities, respectively. In THE Asia University Rankings, there were nine Bangladeshi universities in 2024; comparatively, there were five universities in 2023 and only three in the 2022 rankings. Clearly, the number of universities is increasing in both QS and THE rankings. However, their positions (especially of the private universities) have much to be desired.

Every year, there is triumphant clamour in Bangladesh about those institutions ahead of others; yet, they typically rise and fall within the lower bandwidth. Consequently, even the highest-ranked universities in the country remain confined to subordinate categories. In contrast, the world's top-ranking universities consistently demonstrate many distinct strengths and characteristics. For one, top-ranked universities are known for their high-impact research in peer-reviewed publications, in substantial quantities, often leading pioneering studies and setting trends. They also attract substantial funding from governments, private institutions, and industry partnerships to support cutting-edge and innovative ideas pursued in contemporary facilities.

Celebrated universities are also staffed by renowned and distinguished scholars. They are often leaders in their fields, with extensive publications and citations. It must be emphasised that they are also exceptional educators, sharing their knowledge in engaging learning environments that stretch the imagination of and experiences for their students.

Top universities have rigorous admissions criteria, seeking high-achieving and motivated students, often from various cultures and socioeconomic backgrounds to enrich the academic space. Support for students, including scholarships, mentorship programmes and career services, is extensive, which results in high retention and graduation rates. In Bangladesh, an often-ignored area is our students' mental health needing serious attention.

While expensive, leading universities invest in modern facilities, libraries, digital resources, e-learning platforms and related tools needed for a mind-stretching educational experience. Recreational facilities are also extensive to make mind and body work in unison. Facilities for spiritual nurture enhance the synergy.

Top universities offer a vast number of programmes and disciplines, providing numerous choices for students with an array of interests. They also promote interdisciplinary education that creates room for exploration and expansion of the mind. Furthermore, the curriculum is designed to develop students' analytical and critical thinking and problem-solving skills, preparing them for leadership roles. Universities like MIT promote innovation by providing incubators and reasonable funding for startups. This encourages students and faculty to translate their ideas into products, services or even businesses. Startups created by Stanford University generate around $2.7 trillion in annual revenues! These universities also have technology transfer offices that help commercialise research findings and new ideas, secure patents, and harmonise industry partnerships.

Many top-class universities have extensive international collaborations, student exchange programmes and joint degree offerings, allowing students and faculty to gain global perspectives. Faculty exchange programmes bring in international faculty to foster global awareness and understanding.

Top-class universities are blessed with effective leaders (and governance structures) who are visionary in their outlook, driving strategic initiatives well-adapted to changing educational trends. The strategic plans they craft, from collective and inclusive thinking, generally focus on improving teaching quality, strengthening research, encouraging student engagement with their communities, and expanding global presence.

These are some basic elements that universities in Bangladesh must aspire to shape as a fundamental goal to rise in stature, recognition and impact. Achieving this should lead to an improvement in rankings—not as the primary objective, but as a by-product.

While featuring in the international rankings is not the be-all-end-all of a university's pursuits, participation helps attending to several important impact parameters. For example, the ranking organisations can drive impactful research that can contribute to industry, academia, and ultimately society. Thus, QS rankings emphasise academic reputation (30 percent), citations per faculty (20 percent), and international research networking (five percent), while THE rankings emphasise similar traits, particularly research quality (30 percent) and the research environment (29 percent).

Bangladesh's universities, especially the private ones, currently assign unusually high teaching loads to the faculty. Due to current policies, faculty members are fully engaged in teaching (four to five classes of 175-250 students each term) with little time for research. Then there are other administrative tasks such as mentoring, serving on numerous committees, being a part of co-curricular activities, or even helping with the admission process to ensure stable enrolment—a survival issue for private universities. With faculty members stretched to the limit, often for inconspicuous tasks, the real task of building university reputation gets sidetracked.

There are a number of programmes that the government can initiate. One is creating national rankings based on selected and locally relevant parameters to benchmark quality, tracking quality progression, and infusing a competitive ethos (especially for research grants) in the otherwise indolent academic ecosystem. In the absence of reliable local ranking mechanisms, internationally recognised rankings are currently used to signal university quality. This is inadequate and raises questions about relevance. To be sure, celebrating rankings has become a controversial and contentious matter.

Launching quality PhD programmes (under stringent conditions) and promoting high-impact research publications are also important to add value to the universities. However, the availability of qualified supervisors, as well as internal and external examiners, represents a significant challenge. Encouraging publication in the Web of Science (WoS) or Scopus platforms that include indexed journals from Taylor & Francis, Springer, Emerald and other publishers can quickly shape high-impact research. Creative incentives must be devised for those who publish in these competitive arenas.

Faculty members play the largest role in imparting quality education and building a brand reputation for a university. But their recruitment, especially at senior levels, still depends on academic degrees and length of teaching (experience). This is no longer sufficient and must be enhanced by placing more weight on their publications in various indexed platforms. Importance must also be given to inclusion in Google Scholar, Scopus or Scimago, along with h-index and other quality markers known for evaluating scholarly output.

The advancement to senior ranks, particularly at the associate and full professor level, must require MPhil or PhD-level supervision and serving as examiners, locally and internationally. They must also publish papers with young scholars and junior faculty members and groom them through intellectual exchange. Participating on editorial boards of scholarly journals and engaging in peer review are additional key activities that set scholars apart from others.

To keep pace with global progression, private universities in Bangladesh may invite visiting professors from across the region/globe. An international exchange programme (for faculty and students) would also contribute to international recognition.

Industry linkages are another challenge for the private universities. Industry-driven research projects, academia-industry collaboration, arranging regular industry talks and symposiums, industry visits, etc could contribute to enhancing reputation and rankings.

To develop a university as a centre of excellence, the key executives must possess several vital characteristics like vision, ethical leadership, willingness to take risks, high capability, and a futuristic outlook. Their performance must be reviewed regularly by the board of trustees based on selected criteria to promote continuous quality improvement and to guide good governance of the university on its journey to greater heights.

In recent times, the quality and capability of members of the board of trustees in private universities have raised questions. For those lacking experience in university management, a crash course may be developed to enlighten and inspire them to discern between running academia and industrial outfits. Such courses are also important for those who come to serve in academia late in life from other careers. The board may consider engaging academic advisers to assist with leadership selection, developing training modules and research tracks, designing academia-focused evaluation systems, driving motivation programmes, and a host of other issues.

The global higher education landscape is becoming increasingly competitive, and universities worldwide are striving to improve their rankings and image. A few Bangladeshi private universities have made good progress but they face significant challenges. If universities prioritise quality education, foster a research culture, advance technology adoption, and promote internationalisation, achieving a place in global rankings will naturally follow.


Dr Syed Saad Andaleeb is distinguished professor emeritus at Pennsylvania State University in the US, former faculty member of the Institute of Business Administration (IBA) of Dhaka University, and former vice-chancellor of BRAC University.

Dr Md Mamun Habib is professor at the School of Business and Entrepreneurship in Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB), visiting scientist at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) in the US, and adjunct professor at Universiti Tun Abdul Razak (UNIRAZAK) in Malaysia.


Views expressed in this article are the author's own.


Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries and analyses by experts and professionals. To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.


 

Comments

Pathways to world rankings for private universities in Bangladesh

FILE VISUAL: SHAIKH SULTANA JAHAN BADHON

A review of the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings indicates that the number of Bangladeshi universities in the rankings are increasing. In 2025, as many as 15 universities are listed, whereas there were four universities in 2023 and two in 2022. Among them, about 50 percent (in 2025 and 2024) are private universities.

In the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings, there are 17 universities in 2025, whereas in 2024 and 2023, there were nine and five universities, respectively. In THE Asia University Rankings, there were nine Bangladeshi universities in 2024; comparatively, there were five universities in 2023 and only three in the 2022 rankings. Clearly, the number of universities is increasing in both QS and THE rankings. However, their positions (especially of the private universities) have much to be desired.

Every year, there is triumphant clamour in Bangladesh about those institutions ahead of others; yet, they typically rise and fall within the lower bandwidth. Consequently, even the highest-ranked universities in the country remain confined to subordinate categories. In contrast, the world's top-ranking universities consistently demonstrate many distinct strengths and characteristics. For one, top-ranked universities are known for their high-impact research in peer-reviewed publications, in substantial quantities, often leading pioneering studies and setting trends. They also attract substantial funding from governments, private institutions, and industry partnerships to support cutting-edge and innovative ideas pursued in contemporary facilities.

Celebrated universities are also staffed by renowned and distinguished scholars. They are often leaders in their fields, with extensive publications and citations. It must be emphasised that they are also exceptional educators, sharing their knowledge in engaging learning environments that stretch the imagination of and experiences for their students.

Top universities have rigorous admissions criteria, seeking high-achieving and motivated students, often from various cultures and socioeconomic backgrounds to enrich the academic space. Support for students, including scholarships, mentorship programmes and career services, is extensive, which results in high retention and graduation rates. In Bangladesh, an often-ignored area is our students' mental health needing serious attention.

While expensive, leading universities invest in modern facilities, libraries, digital resources, e-learning platforms and related tools needed for a mind-stretching educational experience. Recreational facilities are also extensive to make mind and body work in unison. Facilities for spiritual nurture enhance the synergy.

Top universities offer a vast number of programmes and disciplines, providing numerous choices for students with an array of interests. They also promote interdisciplinary education that creates room for exploration and expansion of the mind. Furthermore, the curriculum is designed to develop students' analytical and critical thinking and problem-solving skills, preparing them for leadership roles. Universities like MIT promote innovation by providing incubators and reasonable funding for startups. This encourages students and faculty to translate their ideas into products, services or even businesses. Startups created by Stanford University generate around $2.7 trillion in annual revenues! These universities also have technology transfer offices that help commercialise research findings and new ideas, secure patents, and harmonise industry partnerships.

Many top-class universities have extensive international collaborations, student exchange programmes and joint degree offerings, allowing students and faculty to gain global perspectives. Faculty exchange programmes bring in international faculty to foster global awareness and understanding.

Top-class universities are blessed with effective leaders (and governance structures) who are visionary in their outlook, driving strategic initiatives well-adapted to changing educational trends. The strategic plans they craft, from collective and inclusive thinking, generally focus on improving teaching quality, strengthening research, encouraging student engagement with their communities, and expanding global presence.

These are some basic elements that universities in Bangladesh must aspire to shape as a fundamental goal to rise in stature, recognition and impact. Achieving this should lead to an improvement in rankings—not as the primary objective, but as a by-product.

While featuring in the international rankings is not the be-all-end-all of a university's pursuits, participation helps attending to several important impact parameters. For example, the ranking organisations can drive impactful research that can contribute to industry, academia, and ultimately society. Thus, QS rankings emphasise academic reputation (30 percent), citations per faculty (20 percent), and international research networking (five percent), while THE rankings emphasise similar traits, particularly research quality (30 percent) and the research environment (29 percent).

Bangladesh's universities, especially the private ones, currently assign unusually high teaching loads to the faculty. Due to current policies, faculty members are fully engaged in teaching (four to five classes of 175-250 students each term) with little time for research. Then there are other administrative tasks such as mentoring, serving on numerous committees, being a part of co-curricular activities, or even helping with the admission process to ensure stable enrolment—a survival issue for private universities. With faculty members stretched to the limit, often for inconspicuous tasks, the real task of building university reputation gets sidetracked.

There are a number of programmes that the government can initiate. One is creating national rankings based on selected and locally relevant parameters to benchmark quality, tracking quality progression, and infusing a competitive ethos (especially for research grants) in the otherwise indolent academic ecosystem. In the absence of reliable local ranking mechanisms, internationally recognised rankings are currently used to signal university quality. This is inadequate and raises questions about relevance. To be sure, celebrating rankings has become a controversial and contentious matter.

Launching quality PhD programmes (under stringent conditions) and promoting high-impact research publications are also important to add value to the universities. However, the availability of qualified supervisors, as well as internal and external examiners, represents a significant challenge. Encouraging publication in the Web of Science (WoS) or Scopus platforms that include indexed journals from Taylor & Francis, Springer, Emerald and other publishers can quickly shape high-impact research. Creative incentives must be devised for those who publish in these competitive arenas.

Faculty members play the largest role in imparting quality education and building a brand reputation for a university. But their recruitment, especially at senior levels, still depends on academic degrees and length of teaching (experience). This is no longer sufficient and must be enhanced by placing more weight on their publications in various indexed platforms. Importance must also be given to inclusion in Google Scholar, Scopus or Scimago, along with h-index and other quality markers known for evaluating scholarly output.

The advancement to senior ranks, particularly at the associate and full professor level, must require MPhil or PhD-level supervision and serving as examiners, locally and internationally. They must also publish papers with young scholars and junior faculty members and groom them through intellectual exchange. Participating on editorial boards of scholarly journals and engaging in peer review are additional key activities that set scholars apart from others.

To keep pace with global progression, private universities in Bangladesh may invite visiting professors from across the region/globe. An international exchange programme (for faculty and students) would also contribute to international recognition.

Industry linkages are another challenge for the private universities. Industry-driven research projects, academia-industry collaboration, arranging regular industry talks and symposiums, industry visits, etc could contribute to enhancing reputation and rankings.

To develop a university as a centre of excellence, the key executives must possess several vital characteristics like vision, ethical leadership, willingness to take risks, high capability, and a futuristic outlook. Their performance must be reviewed regularly by the board of trustees based on selected criteria to promote continuous quality improvement and to guide good governance of the university on its journey to greater heights.

In recent times, the quality and capability of members of the board of trustees in private universities have raised questions. For those lacking experience in university management, a crash course may be developed to enlighten and inspire them to discern between running academia and industrial outfits. Such courses are also important for those who come to serve in academia late in life from other careers. The board may consider engaging academic advisers to assist with leadership selection, developing training modules and research tracks, designing academia-focused evaluation systems, driving motivation programmes, and a host of other issues.

The global higher education landscape is becoming increasingly competitive, and universities worldwide are striving to improve their rankings and image. A few Bangladeshi private universities have made good progress but they face significant challenges. If universities prioritise quality education, foster a research culture, advance technology adoption, and promote internationalisation, achieving a place in global rankings will naturally follow.


Dr Syed Saad Andaleeb is distinguished professor emeritus at Pennsylvania State University in the US, former faculty member of the Institute of Business Administration (IBA) of Dhaka University, and former vice-chancellor of BRAC University.

Dr Md Mamun Habib is professor at the School of Business and Entrepreneurship in Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB), visiting scientist at the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) in the US, and adjunct professor at Universiti Tun Abdul Razak (UNIRAZAK) in Malaysia.


Views expressed in this article are the author's own.


Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries and analyses by experts and professionals. To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.


 

Comments