Considering the evolving landscape of personal injury law, it is imperative to consider the introduction of comprehensive injury law in Bangladesh, particularly when juxtaposed with established frameworks such as the Canadian legal system. The Canadian approach—epitomised by the Insurance Act, the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS), and the Automobile Accident Benefits Service (AABS)—provides a robust model for ensuring equitable compensation for injured parties. The Insurance Act (RSC 1970, c 1-21) serves as the cornerstone of Canada's insurance regulatory framework, mandating insurers to adhere to principles of fairness and accessibility in their operations.

Section 10 of the Act delineates the obligations of insurers to provide comprehensive coverage, ensuring that victims of automobile accidents receive timely and appropriate compensation. This is complemented by the SABS, which establishes a no-fault compensation scheme aimed at expediting benefits to injured individuals, thereby minimising litigation and fostering a more efficient resolution process.

Read more

Bangladesh needs to introduce a good samaritan law

The AABS further enhances this framework by providing a streamlined mechanism for disputes related to accident benefits. Under Section 2 of the AABS, injured parties are afforded access to a range of benefits, including medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, and income replacement, reflecting a commitment to support recovery and reintegration into society. This structured approach not only aids victims but also alleviates the burden on the judicial system, allowing courts to focus on more complex matters. In stark contrast, the current legal environment in Bangladesh remains largely unregulated with respect to personal injury law. The absence of a formalised framework for addressing injury claims results in significant challenges for victims seeking redress. The lack of statutory guidelines hampers timely access to benefits, often leaving injured individuals to navigate a labyrinthine process devoid of clarity or support.

Introducing a comprehensive injury law regime in Bangladesh could harness the principles established in Canadian legislation. By instituting a no-fault insurance system akin to the SABS, the Bangladeshi legal framework could ensure that victims receive immediate support without the protracted delays associated with litigation. Furthermore, adopting mechanisms for dispute resolution, as seen in the AABS, could enhance accessibility and efficiency, ultimately fostering a more equitable legal landscape. The imperative for reform is underscored by the increasing prevalence of road traffic accidents in Bangladesh, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Establishing a robust injury law framework would not only provide essential protections for these individuals but also promote social justice and economic stability by facilitating recovery and reducing the financial strain on families.

Read more

It’s time our youth used their right to information

Bangladesh, with its rapidly expanding transportation networks and population growth, faces a rising number of road traffic accidents and workplace injuries. Yet, the country lacks a comprehensive legal framework for addressing personal injury claims, especially those resulting from road traffic accidents, industrial work, and other public incidents. The absence of such laws leaves victims in vulnerable positions, with limited recourse for compensation and rehabilitation. While the country does have some provisions under civil law, these are often insufficient in addressing the scale of issues faced by accident victims. Medical expenses, long-term rehabilitation, and lost income due to injury are frequently borne by the victims themselves, without sufficient support from the government or insurers. This creates a significant gap in the social safety net, which ultimately hinders Bangladesh's progress in building a robust, equitable society.

Implementing a personal injury law framework modelled after Canada's SABS and Insurance Act could bring numerous benefits to Bangladesh, from enhancing public health and safety to strengthening the economy.

Here are some of the key advantages:

Better protection for accident victims

One of the primary benefits of the SABS system is its ability to provide immediate financial and medical support to accident victims. In a country like Bangladesh, where road traffic accidents claim thousands of lives every year, having a well-structured system for compensating victims can significantly reduce the financial burden on individuals and their families. Implementing similar provisions could ensure that injured parties receive timely medical treatment, rehabilitation, and lost income compensation, regardless of fault.

This would be particularly beneficial in Bangladesh, where the healthcare system often struggles with limited resources. Injury law modelled after the SABS could help alleviate some of the pressure on the state-funded healthcare system by providing insurance-based coverage for accident victims.

Reduced financial burden on the state

In the absence of a well-structured injury law, the financial burden of treating and compensating accident victims often falls on the state. In Bangladesh, government hospitals and social welfare programmes bear a significant portion of these costs. However, introducing a mandatory injury law could shift much of this burden to private insurers, alleviating pressure on public resources and ensuring a more sustainable model for handling personal injury claims.

In Canada, the implementation of SABS and the Insurance Act has significantly reduced the reliance on public funds for accident-related injuries. By requiring all drivers to have mandatory insurance coverage, the system ensures that the financial needs of victims are met without overtaxing public resources.

Promoting road safety and workplace protections

The existence of a comprehensive injury law framework can also serve as a deterrent against reckless driving and unsafe working conditions. In Canada, the knowledge that drivers are required by law to carry insurance, and that accident victims will be compensated, has led to heightened awareness about road safety. Similarly, workplace injury laws encourage employers to take proactive steps to protect their workers.

By implementing similar laws in Bangladesh, the government could help reduce accident rates while also encouraging safer work environments. For instance, with the introduction of no-fault insurance for motor vehicle accidents, drivers may be more inclined to follow traffic laws, knowing that their actions will have direct financial consequences for others.

Boosting economic productivity

The economic impact of implementing personal injury laws could also be significant. By providing compensation for lost wages due to injury, injured workers can return to their lives and responsibilities faster, thus minimising productivity losses. Furthermore, the introduction of a no-fault insurance system could lead to a reduction in lengthy litigation, which currently plagues the country's legal system. With faster claims processing and clear guidelines for insurance companies, businesses can focus on economic activities rather than dealing with costly legal disputes.

Improved legal transparency and access

The clear guidelines set out in Canada's Insurance Act provide a transparent framework that individuals can easily navigate when filing injury claims. This transparency can help reduce the occurrence of fraud, streamline the claims' process, and ensure that victims receive their entitled benefits. By adopting a similar legal framework, Bangladesh could create a more accessible system for people who are injured, reducing the frustration and confusion that many experience when seeking justice in the current system.

Despite the clear benefits, implementing a similar system in Bangladesh would not come without challenges. One major hurdle would be creating the necessary infrastructure for such a system. The insurance industry in Bangladesh is still developing, and widespread compliance with mandatory insurance laws would require substantial government oversight, as well as public awareness campaigns to ensure that citizens understand their rights and responsibilities.

In summary, the introduction of a comprehensive injury law system in Bangladesh, informed by the successful tenets of Canadian legislation, is not merely beneficial but necessary. It presents an opportunity to safeguard the rights of injured parties, promote equitable access to justice, and enhance the overall integrity of the legal system. As Bangladesh continues to develop, the integration of these principles will be crucial in building a resilient society capable of responding to the needs of its most vulnerable citizens.

Shekh Eshtiak Ahmed is litigation legal assistant at Joseph Sidiropoulos LPC, Toronto, Canada.

Views expressed in this article are the author's own.

Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries, and analyses by experts and professionals. To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.